Having spent over a decade analyzing basketball mechanics and coaching developing players, I've come to appreciate that shooting isn't just about putting the ball through the hoop—it's about understanding which shot to take when, and why certain forms work better than others. The recent trade between Titan Ultra Giant Risers and NorthPort fascinates me precisely because it highlights how teams value different scoring abilities. When the Risers acquired the "underrated but efficient" Ular for Kwekuteye, they weren't just trading players—they were trading shooting profiles, and that's something I find absolutely compelling.
Let me start with the most fundamental shot in basketball: the jump shot. When I work with young players, I always emphasize that proper jump shot mechanics involve approximately 45 degrees of elbow bend, feet shoulder-width apart, and a release point that should be somewhere between the eyebrow and forehead level. What makes a player like Ular particularly interesting is his mid-range efficiency—he consistently shoots around 48% from 10-16 feet, which might not sound flashy but creates crucial spacing opportunities. I've always preferred players who master the mid-range game over those who solely rely on three-pointers, even in today's three-point obsessed era. There's an artistry to creating space for that fifteen-footer that's being lost in modern basketball.
Now let's talk about my personal favorite—the floater. This is the shot that separates good guards from great ones. The floater typically arcs about 10-12 feet high and should be released with backspin of about 120-150 RPM. I've noticed that European players tend to have more consistent floaters than their American counterparts, possibly because they're taught to use it earlier in their development. When I watch players driving to the basket, I can immediately tell who's worked on their floater—there's a certain softness to the release that can't be faked. The recent trade discussion reminds me that while Kwekuteye might have more highlight-reel dunks, Ular's efficiency likely comes from mastering these high-percentage interior shots that don't always make SportsCenter.
The three-point revolution has completely transformed how we think about shooting. When I first started coaching back in 2005, we'd be happy with players shooting 35% from beyond the arc—now anything below 37% is considered subpar for a specialist. The mathematics are clear: shooting 40% from three-point range is equivalent to shooting 60% from two-point territory. But here's where I differ from many analytics-driven coaches—I believe teams have become too reliant on threes. There's a psychological component to shooting that stats don't capture. I've seen too many games where teams live and die by the three, completely abandoning the mid-range game that could save them during cold streaks.
Hook shots are becoming something of a lost art, which is a shame because they're incredibly efficient when executed properly. The traditional skyhook that Kareem made famous had an arc of about 53 degrees and typically rotated at 80-100 RPM. Modern big men tend to favor turnaround jumpers instead, but I've always felt that's a mistake. When I analyze Ular's game footage, I notice he occasionally uses a mini-hook in the post—it's not textbook, but it's effective, and that's what matters. Efficiency over form, as long as the ball goes in consistently.
Layups might seem basic, but they're actually among the most technically complex shots in basketball. The degree of English on the ball, the angle of approach, the footwork—there are so many variables that most fans never notice. I've counted at least seven distinct types of layups in modern NBA games, from the basic overhand to the reverse to the Euro-step finish. What's fascinating about the trade we're discussing is that both players involved have very different layup packages—Kwekuteye prefers explosive straight-line drives, while Ular utilizes more crafty angles and spin. Personally, I'd take the crafty finisher over the explosive one nine times out of ten—consistency beats flash in the long run.
Free throws are where shooting technique gets isolated, and they reveal everything about a player's mental fortitude. The best free throw shooters in history—players like Steve Nash and Stephen Curry—share common traits: consistent pre-shot routines, focused breathing patterns, and what I call "selective deafness" to crowd noise. When I work with players on free throws, I have them practice with distractions intentionally created—loud music, shouted insults, sudden noises. Because in a close game, that's exactly what they'll face. The mental aspect of shooting is what separates good shooters from great ones, and it's something that's incredibly difficult to measure with statistics alone.
As we look at the evolution of shooting, I'm convinced we're heading toward more specialized shot profiles rather than well-rounded scorers. The Titan Ultra Giant Risers' acquisition of Ular reflects this trend—they identified a specific shooting skill set they needed and went after it, even if it meant giving up a more recognizable name in Kwekuteye. In my ideal basketball world, we'd see more players developing complete scoring packages rather than hyper-specializing, but the economic incentives of modern basketball push toward specialization. Still, there's something beautiful about watching a player who can score from anywhere on the court—the mid-range pull-up, the corner three, the crafty finish at the rim. That comprehensive scoring ability is what I'll always value most, even if the analytics department disagrees with me.
Indian Super League Live TodayCopyrights